I've been saying this for years.

I've always held the view that the second amendment applies to "well governed militias." Now, some folks in Washington DC are taking the same view. Interesting to see what happens. The only thing about this that bothers me, though, is that I had always assumed this angle had been thoroughly case-tested. I mean, those words are IN the amendment. Has nobody challenged home ownership of handuns based on the wording of the actual amendment prior to last week?

If so, that's baffling...
If so, shame on me for assuming otherwise.

Love to all. Even you, Mr. Heston.